STUDIES ON PURITY AND STABILITY OF PHOTOPATCH TEST SUBSTANCESBRUZE M; FREGERT S.1983; CONTACT DERMATITIS; ISSN 0105-1873; DNK; DA. 1983; VOL. 9; NO 1; PP. 33-39; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

PHOTOEPICUTANEOUS TESTING. INFLUENCE OF THE VEHICLE, OCCLUSION TIME AND CONCENTRATION OF THE TEST SUBSTANCES ON THE RESULTS.SUHONEN R.1976; CONTACT DERMAT.; DENM.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 218-226; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE POLYMORPHIC PHOTOTEST REACTIONJANSEN C.1982; ARCH. DERMATOL. (CHIC., 1960); ISSN 0003-987X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 118; NO 9; PP. 638-642; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

ACTINIC PRURIGO: A CASE REPORT WITH SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION OF SKIN LESIONSAOKI T; FUJITA M.1980; CLIN. EXPER. DERMATOL.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 47-52; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

DERMATITE CHRONIQUE DE PHOTOSENSIBILITE ECREMATEUSE)WOLSKA H; KLENIEWSKA D; KOWALSKI J et al.1976; PRZEGL. DERMATOL.; POLSKA; DA. 1976; VOL. 63; NO 4; PP. 429-434; ABS. RUSSE ANGL.; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

PATHOGENESIS OF SOLAR URTICARIA. SWEAT DROPLET IN TESTING FOR PHOTOSENSIBILITY.SHELLEY WB; HEATON CL.1976; ARCH. DERMATOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 112; NO 6; PP. 850-852; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

SOLAR URTICARIA INHIBITED BY VISIBLE LIGHTTORINUKI W; KUMAI N; MIURA T et al.1983; DERMATOLOGICA; ISSN 0011-9075; CHE; DA. 1983; VOL. 166; NO 3; PP. 151-155; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ACTINIC RETICULOIDMARX JL; VALE M; DERMER P et al.1982; ARCH. DERMATOL. (CHIC., 1960); ISSN 0003-987X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 118; NO 9; PP. 672-675; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

LICHENOID DERMATITIS DUE TO CHLORPROMAZINE PHOTOTOXICITYMATSUO I; OZAWA A; NIIZUMA K et al.1979; DERMATOLOGICA; CHE; DA. 1979; VOL. 159; NO 1; PP. 46-49; H.T. 1; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

Effect of ultraviolet irradiation of photopatch test substances in vitroBRUZE, M; FREGERT, S; LJUNGGREN, B et al.Photodermatology. 1985, Vol 2, Num 1, pp 32-37, issn 0108-9684Article

PHOTOTOXICITY FROM FUROCOUMARINS (PSORALENS) OF HERACLEUM LACINIATUM IN A PATIENT WITH VITILIGO. ACTION SPECTRUM STUDIES ON BERGAPTEN, PIMPINELLIN, ANGELIAN AND SPHONDINKAVLI G; MIDELFART K; RAA J et al.1983; CONTACT DERMATITIS; ISSN 0105-1873; DNK; DA. 1983; VOL. 9; NO 5; PP. 364-366; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

RECOVERY OF SKIN FROM A SINGLE SUBERYTHEMAL DOSE OF ULTRAVIOLET RADIATIONARBADI L; GANGE RW; PARRISH JA et al.1983; JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY; ISSN 0022-202X; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 81; NO 1; PP. 78-82; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THE ANALYSIS OF THE ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION DOSES REQUIRED TO PRODUCE ERYTHEMAL RESPONSES IN NORMAL SKINMACKENZIE LA.1983; BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY. 1951; ISSN 0007-0963; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 108; NO 1; PP. 1-9; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

STATISTICAL STUDY OF INDIVIDUAL VARIATIONS IN SUNBURN SENSITIVITY IN 303 VOLUNTEERS WITHOUT PHOTODERMATOSISAMBLARD P; BEANI J; GAUTRON R et al.1982; ARCHIVES FOR DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH; ISSN 0340-3696; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 274; NO 3-4; PP. 195-206; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

THE SCANDINAVIAN STANDARD PHOTOPATCH TEST PROCEDUREJANSE CT; WENNERSTEN G; RYSTEDT I et al.1982; CONTACT DERMATITIS; ISSN 0105-1873; DNK; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 155-158; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

SOLAR URTICARIA. CLINICAL FEATURES AND WAVELENGTH DEPENDENCERAVITS M; ARMSTRONG RB; HARBER LC et al.1982; ARCH. DERMATOL. (CHIC., 1960); ISSN 0003-987X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 118; NO 4; PP. 228-231; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

PHOTOALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS TO MUSK AMBRETTE. HISTOPATHOLOGIC FEATURES OF PHOTOBIOLOGIC REACTIONS OBSERVED IN A PERSISTENT LIGHT REACTORGIOVINAZZO VJ; HARBER LC; BICKERS DR et al.1981; ARCH. DERMATOL. (CHIC., 1960); ISSN 0003-987X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 117; NO 6; PP. 344-348; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

ORTICARIA SOLARE: STUDIO CLINICO E FOTOBIOLOGICO PROSPETTIVE TERAPEUTICHE PRESENTAZIONE DI 3 CASI = URTICAIRE SOLAIRE: ETUDE CLINIQUE ET PHOTOBIOLOGIQUE, PERSPECTIVES THERAPEUTIQUES, PRESENTATION DE 5 CASSARTORIS S; GOITRE M; CERVETTI O et al.1979; G. ITAL. DERMATOL., MINERVA DERMATOL.; ITA; DA. 1979; VOL. 113; NO 12; PP. 819-832; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ACTINIC RETICULOID. A CLINICAL, PATHOLOGIC, AND ACTION SPECTRUM STUDYJOHNSON SC; CRIPPS DJ; NORBACK DH et al.1979; ARCH. DERMATOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 115; NO 9; PP. 1078-1083; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

ON THE ACCURACY OF DIFFERENTIAL MEASUREMENTS OF THE MINIMAL ERYTHEMA DOSE: INFLUENCE OF THE DISCRETENESS OF THE SCALEBRULS WAG; FABER JAJ; VAN DER LEUN JC et al.1982; PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY; ISSN 0031-8655; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 36; NO 5; PP. 531-535; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

PHOTOCONTACT ALLERGY TO BENZOCAINEKAIDBEY KH.1981; ARCH. DERMATOL. (CHIC., 1960); ISSN 0003-987X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 117; NO 2; PP. 77-79; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF HISTOPATHOLOGY IN POLYMORPHOUS LIGHT ERUPTION LIGHT TESTINGTANENBAUM L; MARK GJ; MIHM MC et al.1981; CLIN. EXP. DERMATOL.; ISSN 0307-6938; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 6; NO 2; PP. 123-132; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

A STUDY OF THE PHOTOSENSITIVE FACTOR IN RELATION TO SKIN LESIONS OF MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES PATIENTSVOLDEN G.1980; DERMATOLOGICA; CHE; DA. 1980; VOL. 161; NO 2; PP. 89-92; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

SOLAR URTICARIA. REPORT OF AN UNUSUAL CASECHULL WAN IHM.1979; CUTIS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 23; NO 6; PP. 784-786; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

PHOTOSENSITIVITY DUE TO A FLUOROURACIL DERIVATIVEHORIO T; MURAI T; IKAI K et al.1978; ARCH. DERMATOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 114; NO 10; PP. 1498-1500; BIBL. 8 REF.Article